|
Excerpt: Astrological
Crosses in Relationships: Understanding Cardinal, Fixed & Mutable
Energies
A Cross by Any Other Name
Qualities, quadruplicities, quadratures, modes, types . . . it seems a
necessary exercise just to sort through the various names given this
division of the zodiac. The quadruplicities, as defined by astrologer
Nicholas deVore, "are the four signs which have the same quality;
either cardinal, fixed or mutable." He further defines them by
adding that "there are three types, or qualities . . . the Cardinal
or Initiative signs, the Fixed or Executive signs and the Mutable or
Deductive signs. As there are four in each, these are known as the
Quadruplicities." Astrologers Marion March and Joan McEvers teach
that "we can . . . divide the twelve signs of the zodiac into three
groups of four signs each; the signs in each group have certain
qualities in common. Each group has a distinct mode of operating in
life. The qualities, or quadruplicities are . . ."
Although of common usage, the terms type and quality do not quite convey
the intrinsically dynamic nature of the crosses, especially as they are
revealed in speech and action, as intimated in the introduction of the
current work. In fact, the term quality is at the very least a vague
description and at worst a misleading characterization of the crosses,
because there are positive manifestations of each cross as well as
destructive and harmful manifestations, as will be shown in the chapters
that follow. A quality is generally perceived as a positive attribute,
such as generosity, kindness, caring, or a sense of humor, while in the
full range of human experiences, the crosses can manifest less laudable
traits, such as zealotry, cruelty, and indifference. But, as pointed out
by March and McEvers, the crosses do indicate a distinct mode of
operation.
The terms quadruplicity and quadratures refer to the relationship of the
group to the number four-there are four signs in each cross grouping,
just as the term triplicity refers to the three signs that belong to
each of the four elements. There are also four signs per house grouping:
angular, succedent, and cadent. However, the term quadruplicity does not
seem to dignify the crosses with the uniqueness they deserve; they are
much more than a structural division into three groups of four units.
Astrologer Marc Edmund Jones gives a thought-provoking, albeit somewhat
esoteric, introduction to the crosses, even suggesting the existence of
a process of individuation through manifestation in the crosses:
"What the quadratures bring to the foreground of analysis . . . is
the wholly individualistic way in which the given person stands up to
experience in being himself, or the level upon which he
characteristically enters upon or leaves a particular milieu of
relationship . . . The cardinal, common (mutable) and fixed groupings of
the signs-in their geometrical correspondence to the angular, cadent and
succedent houses in that order-reveal the fundamentally dynamic
recalcitrance oftemperament, through the rather simple distinction
between those . . . who find the things at hand most interesting,
approach experience in mutual act or response with other people, and
meet the issues of their existence by following their own inner
leading."
Jones' definition promises more for the crosses, implying the existence
of a dynamic essence to be found within the crosses, a nature that is
far more compelling than that represented by a mere "quality."
Here we get a sense that the cross will actually motivate the native
toward a process of individuation. Although individuation may not always
be the goal of all motivation, there is much in the nature of each cross
that will contribute to the nature of one's motivations.
A study of the actual structure derived from the angular relationships
of the signs within a cross grouping gives us a better understanding of
the dynamic nature of this sign division. Each sign in a cross is either
in square aspect (a 90° relationship) or in opposition (a 180°
relationship) to the other signs of the same group. Aries and Capricorn
are in square aspect to each other, as are Libra and Cancer; Capricorn
and Cancer are in opposition, as are Aries and Libra. Both the square
and the opposition aspects are challenging aspects and therefore hold a
potential for growth, action, change, and transformation when expressed
positively, or destruction and stagnation when a healthy outlet of
expression has not been found.
By their basic structure, the crosses represent far more dynamic groups
than do the elements. When connected together by aspect, each of the
three signs of an element will form a Grand Trine; that is, they are in
trine aspect to each other. For example, aspects drawn between planets
at 15° of the signs Aries, Leo, and Sagittarius will form a triangle,
or a fire Grand Trine. Trines represent the smooth, easy flow of energy,
or the unchallenged exchange between two points or, in this case,
between three points. Trine aspects represent the talents and abilities
toward which we turn when our need to be creative, proactive, or even
reactive supercedes our desire for maintenance and continuity.
Trine-aspect configurations are used in our normal responses to life
situations or just to go about our daily activities. In transit, trines
can easily be taken for granted or even ignored. It has been my
observation, through years of consultation work, that it is not the
transiting trines that move an individual to take action in life or to
become creative and proactive, but rather the more challenging
conjunctions, squares, and oppositions.
Challenging aspects, both natally and by transit,5 create the basic
irritant that seems to be so necessary for bringing out creative and
productive activity in many people, somewhat like when the oyster
secretes nacre to coat a foreign object that has made its way inside its
shell. Just as the oyster will create a pearl, we can create better
lives for ourselves by bringing out and exercising our talents and
special abilities. In general, people don't move unless they, for some
reason, must. Without the challenging aspects, without the energy of the
crosses, there would be little motivation to surpass our current
condition. Charts containing a lack of challenging aspects tend to be
reflected in an easy and uncomplicated existence. Charts containing a
healthy abundance of challenging aspects are reflected in the lives of
individuals who are moved to go beyond the normal boundaries of common
existence, for good or for ill. The popular expression "Necessity
is the mother of invention" clearly illustrates this process. An
individual who possesses a challenging configuration in his chart is
likely to attempt to resolve the associated irritating factors in his
life; an individual with an underchallenged chart is likely to use a
more passive approach to life situations. Note that other structural
factors besides the hard aspects, such as sign placement and
positioning, can generate stress in a chart.
Trines tend to placate, normalize, and stabilize, a necessary part of
the process of growth and evolution without which there would be no
integration of experience or assimilation of knowledge. However, trines,
in and of themselves, do not create the challenging environment that is
essential to cause a person to actually take action. For example, an
opposition of transiting Saturn to the ruler of the Midheaven might
result in a loss of employment; yet the discomforting fear, insecurity,
and disappointment of this same opposition might be sufficient to
provoke the individual to stand back and reevaluate (opposition) his
career situation and, from there, take the necessary action, often based
on the talents inherent in the chart as indicated in part by the trines.
The reality check thus imposed by Saturn's transit might reveal to the
native that he has long undervalued his abilities and must now make a
choice to assume a level of responsibility that better reflects his
abilities. In such a case, a difficult situation, as indicated by this
"hard" transit, would have lead to a desirable outcome.
If the transit had been a trine from transiting Saturn, the situation
would have been perceived as being far less compromising, and probably
more as a positive opportunity to take advantage of experience and to
assume additional responsibility. The result may seem similar, but the
process is quite different; in the case of the opposition, the native is
faced with a challenge that must be overcome, whereas in the case of the
trine, the native simply goes along with the opportunity. Alternatively,
with the trine aspect, the native could just as easily choose to forego
the opportunity if no need for extra work, responsibility, or effort is
experienced; whereas with the hard aspect, some form of action is
generally required or at times even forced upon the native. There is a
greater lesson learned with the opposition experience than with the
trine experience.
While each member of an elemental group also shares the same
polarity-for example, the three fire signs Aries, Leo, and Sagittarius
are also all of the yang, or masculine, polarity-each cross contains two
yin, or feminine, signs, and two yang, or masculine, signs. For example,
the cardinal cross counts the masculine signs Aries and Libra as well as
the feminine signs Capricorn and Cancer. As well as being related to
each other by dynamic aspects (squares and oppositions), the signs in a
cross are further polarized by the confrontation of yin (negative or
feminine) versus yang (positive or masculine) energies. When the
cardinal signs Aries and Capricorn are linked by a square aspect, for
instance, a further element of conflict is brought into play: the daring
and bold outer self-expression and manifestation of the yang sign Aries
versus the cautious, introverted, responsible, survival-oriented yin
sign Capricorn. Planets in the yang sign Leo squaring planets in the yin
sign Scorpio pit bold self-expression (Leo) against a need to preserve a
sense of inner validation or integrity (Scorpio).
Another aspect that needs to be considered when attempting to understand
the impact of angular relationships between planets and signs is the
expansionary process that unfolds with the natural progression from the
first to the last of the signs of the zodiac. This may be easier to
perceive by imagining the zodiac from Aries to Pisces as though it were
a spiral staircase instead of a closed wheel. As one climbs the stairs,
one's perspective on events below changes. A similar change of
perspective occurs in the natural progression of the signs. The spiral
connotes movement, a flow of energy from one level to the next, giving a
gradual increase in complexity of nature from Aries to Taurus to Gemini,
etc. In Aries, there is singleness of purpose, centered around a
personal and often immediate impulse; in Taurus, the focus is on direct
experience and the satisfaction that it provides; in Gemini, we indulge
in self-discovery through an exploration of the environment; in Cancer,
purpose expands to include family members; in Leo, outlets are sought to
externalize and express personal experience; and in Virgo, relationships
are established for the purpose of ensuring the survival of one and all.
In the first six signs, commonly referred to as the personal signs, or
the spring and summer signs, there is growth from a
single-person-centered perspective (Aries to Gemini) to the beginnings
of a community-based, cooperative awareness (Cancer to Virgo). In the
remaining six signs, referred to as the social signs, or the fall and
winter signs, this perspective continues to expand, with Libra acting as
a polarization force for the person-centered Aries, making "the
other" a significant part of the equation of life; in Scorpio, the
resources of others will be considered in addition to personal
resources; in Sagittarius, the learning experience is expanded and
organized into various systems and made available to the community; in
Capricorn, the structuralization process of society is completed by the
implementation of a governing body; in Aquarius, humanity reaches the
fullness of its self-expression and seeks to explore unchartered
territory; and in Pisces, all knowledge and experience are combined into
one complete, transcendental experience to be shared by the collective
awareness. Note that this analogy could have been approached from many
different aspects; this is only one way of connecting the signs to each
other. The reader is invited to trace other possible developmental
lines, using varying facets of the signs.
Given the expanding perspective inherent in the zodiacal spiral, the
relationships between the signs of a cross are further vitalized in
their contacts with each other, so that the self in Aries must consider
family in Cancer, which must find balance in its partnerships and
associations in Libra and then find meaning and purpose in a worldly
function in Capricorn. The sense of self-worth of Taurus will be tested
as it shows the world what it values in Leo, only to be purified in
Scorpio and then taken beyond the boundaries of the common experience to
be further tested in Aquarius. Gemini's interaction with the outside
world will be focused on cooperation and survival in Virgo, which will
then grow to include the broader hierarchies of society in Sagittarius
and then be released into the universal networks of Pisces. The same
principle holds true when taken in reverse order; for example, when
confronted by Leo, Aquarius must take into account the very real
feelings of the individual (Leo) despite his or her vision of a grander,
more understanding humanity (Aquarius). Alternatively, what is good for
the family (Cancer) may not necessarily be what the individual (Aries)
needs.
In providing an appropriate appellation for this division of the zodiac
into three groups of four signs, it is essential to consider the
inherent tensions in the relationships between each of the signs, from
gender dichotomy to hard-aspect configuration. Just as the term elements
aptly describes the fire, earth, air, and water groupings, it now
appears evident that the term crosses appropriately reflects the dynamic
structure of the threefold division of the zodiac into the cardinal,
fixed, and mutable signs.
|
|
|
Astrological
Crosses in Relationships: Understanding Cardinal, Fixed &
Mutable Energies
Astrological Crosses: Your
Personal Energy "Signature"
For the first time ever, here is an astrology book that focuses
on astrological crosses (the cardinal, fixed, and mutable
aspects of the signs of the zodiac) and their impact on people's
lives, behavior, actions, and motivations. Crosses are so
important to truly understanding a chart that you will wonder
how you ever completed an astrological analysis without this
essential component.
Astrological Crosses in Relationships explores the strengths and
challenges of each cross, using many real-life stories taken
from the author's consulting practice. Crosses revealed in the
birth chart provide the best clue to personal energy style:
 | Cardinal energy dreams and
initiates
 | Fixed energy desires and
creates
 | Mutable energy communicates
and analyzes With this innovative guide, you can learn to
identify crosses in everyday life experiences, mend
star-crossed relationships, and balance a lack or
overemphasis of crosses in your birth chart. |
| |
|
|